Research Methodsmanbetx官网手机登陆文章和视频

  • 求解性与可发现性

    以两种不同的方式定位网站或应用程序上的功能或内容:查找(用户查找项目)并发现(用户遇到该项目)。两者都很重要,但需要不同的用户研究技巧来评估。

  • 运行远程可用性测试,第2部分

    了解如何运行远程审核可用性测试。第二个视频涵盖如何实际促进与参与者的会话以及如何以汇报,激励和与您的团队初步分析结束。

  • 运行远程可用性测试,第1部分

    了解如何运行远程审核可用性测试。第1部分涵盖与您的参与者和观察员开始的会话。

  • Catching Cheaters and Outliers in Remote Unmoderated Studies

    在远程可用性研究中,难以识别不应该在研究中的测试参与者,因为它们不适合概况或不要认真对待任务。甚至更难在未经发出的研究中,但它可以(并且应该)完成。

  • Analyzing Qualitative User Data in a Spreadsheet to Show Themes

    从用户研究中的定性数据中的视觉上识别强大主题的简单方法:通过在电子表格中放置个人观察并进行颜色编码。

  • Can Market Research Teams and UX Research Teams Collaborate and Avoid Miscommunication?

    The total customer journey and user experience quality will benefit from considering market research and user research to be highly related, and to integrate the two, instead of keeping different kinds of research teams from collaborating.

  • 你在做真正的发现吗?

    Discoveries are a powerful part of the UX design process, but unfortunately many teams are not doing true discovery. Here are 5 main ways to go wrong.

  • 5.Qualitative Research Methods

    定性用户研究对于UX设计非常宝贵。以下是,除了标准可用性测试之外的5个关键方法概述,对早期发现研究特别有用。

  • 故意沉默作为适度技术

    在用户面试或运行可用性研究时,在用户停止说话后,不要急于谈话。故意保持沉默的时间长于感觉舒适的速度通常会刺激用户融洽。

  • 定性对量化UX研究

    定性和定量方法都有他们在用户研究中的位置,但它们在UX设计过程中解决了不同的问题。了解挑选正确方法的差异,以了解您需要的内容。

  • 不要从小型UX研究中报告数字

    Testing a small number of participants gives qualitative insights, which are great. But if 4 out of 5 test users do something, don't conclude that 80% of all users will do the same.

  • 用户研究中的调查响应偏见

    用户对调查问题的答案往往偏见而不是字面的真理。示例包括默认偏见,社会期望偏见和新近偏见。了解响应偏见的了解将帮助您解释对基于调查结果的任何设计决策的有效性的调查数据。

  • Don't Listen to the Customers

    第一个用户体验设计规则是:不要将产品基于客户*说出所需的产品。您必须在使用您的设计时观看人们实际的*做*。

  • UX Research Cheat Sheet

    Different user research methods are suited for different stages of the UX design process. Here's an overview of the best methods to discover, explore, test, and listen.

  • 在用户研究中开放与已关闭的问题

    When doing user research for a UX design project, we can ask questions in two ways: open-ended (no fixed set of response options) and close-ended (users are restricted to picking from a few answers). Both work well, but only for those research questions they are suited to answer.

  • Between-Subject vs. Within-Subject Study Design in User Research

    There are two ways to structure a UX research study when we're testing two (or more) designs: we can have each design tested by different people, or we can reuse the same users for all conditions. Each approach has some advantages and problems.

  • 树测试评估信息架构类别

    Tree testing is a supplement to card sorting as a user research method for assessing the categories in an information architecture (especially a website IA and its proposed or existing navigation menu structure).

  • Thematic Analysis of Qualitative User Research Data

    User research generates masses of qualitative data in the form of transcripts and observations that can be summarized and made actionable through thematic analysis to identify the main findings.

  • 研究101.

    如何放大用户研究的价值和影响(在做大量UX工作和相关研究时)。

  • 3 UX设计中有效的可视映射策略

    Cognitive maps, mind maps, and concept maps are different ways of visualizing mental models. They each have a role in the UX design process.

  • 语境调查:通过在背景下观察和访谈用户来激发设计

    Through observation and collaborative interpretation, contextual inquiry uncovers insight about user’s that may not be available via other research methods.

  • 如何以及为何招聘备份参与者(AKA“Floaters”)在用户研究中

    Sometimes you should intentionally overrecruit test participants for one-on-one user-research studies. Backup participants must be recruited according to the same screening criteria and paid at least as much as regular participants.

  • Task Analysis: Support Users in Achieving Their Goals

    任务分析是用户如何完成任务以实现其目标的系统研究。这知识确保了产品和服务旨在有效地支持这些目标。

  • 7个步骤来基准您的产品UX

    Benchmark your UX by first determining appropriate metrics and a study methodology. Then track these metrics across different releases of your product by running studies that follow the same established methodology.

  • 远程可用性 - 测试成本:审核与未经说明的

    确切的成本会有所不同,但未经检测的5名参与者研究可能比受体化的研究便宜20-40%,并且可以节省大约20小时的研究员时间。

  • Turning Complex Data into Compelling Stories: A 5-Step Process

    Uncover the story within extensive UX-research data by following a process of revisiting original research objectives and organizing findings into themes.

  • 3人物类型:轻量级,定性和统计

    For most teams, approaching persona creation qualitatively is the right balance of effort vs. value, but very large or very small organizations might benefit from statistical or lightweight approaches, respectively.

  • UX研究中的评级尺度:李克特或语义差异?

    李克特和语义差异是用于确定产品,服务和经验的态度,但根据您的情况,人们可能比其他方式更好。

  • How Well Discovery Phases Are Performed in UX Projects

    Our survey results reveal that many UX practitioners perform discoveries in some shape and form, although many are on the short side, lack user research and don’t involve the right people.

  • 基准UX:跟踪指标

    通过使用指标来定量评估产品或服务的用户体验,以针对有意义的标准衡量其相对性能。

  • Remote Moderated Usability Tests: How to Do Them

    The key to good remote moderated testing is to be thoroughly prepared and organized. Follow these 7 steps to ensure your study’s success.

  • 今天UX职业看起来像什么

    我们对UX职业的最新研究探讨了专业化,探讨了进入该领域的独特背景,并详细介绍了今天在UX中工作所需的技能和职责。

  • Remote Moderated Usability Tests: Why to Do Them

    Remote unmoderated usability testing is so fast and easy that some teams make it their only evaluation method. But don’t shy away from its more robust alternative, the remote moderated usability test, which can give you more information and is also inexpensive.

  • The Discovery Phase in UX Projects

    虽然可以有许多不同的煽动者,角色和涉及发现的活动,但所有发现都努力实现关于解决问题的问题和所需的结果。

  • 如何最大化的见解在用户测试:走User Tasks

    如果您从广泛的任务开始而不是立即导致感兴趣的区域,您可以在用户测试中学到用户测试中的合适类型。准备可用于指导用户的其他专注的任务。

  • The Critical Incident Technique in UX

    The CIT is a research method for systematically obtaining recalled observations of significant events or behaviors from people who have first-hand experience.

  • 用户研究中的道德成熟

    道德上成熟程度如何是您的用户研究实践?通过回答这些简单的问题来评估您当前的道德成熟状态。

  • Tracking Research Questions, Assumptions, and Facts in Agile

    在产品的生命周期中未跟踪与用户相关的问题和假设,导致未对准和过度自信。记录知识库中的这些问题和假设将它们与实际事实区分开来。

  • The Diverge-and-Converge Technique for UX Workshops

    通过首先在问题上独立工作,然后融入分享见解,团队可以利用两种工作风格的好处,从而导致快速数据分析,多样化的想法和高质量的设计。

  • 可用性测试101.

    UX研究人员使用这种流行的观测方法来揭示设计中的问题和机遇。